With even cursory consideration, the concept of assigning a dollar value to wine quality will surely elicit expressions of contempt and disapproving looks from wine lovers, on aesthetic and even ethical grounds. With vast aisles of expensive, well-marketed garbage on store shelves however, the issue of value and quality really doesn’t elude wine lovers. In fact, it is very much a constant concern for this one. As unpalatable as I find ill-conceived synesthetic projections of utilitarianism in phrases like “this wine tastes like $x”, I am all too aware of my constant desire to enjoy more complex wines for much less than what the overly pretentious crowd pays. These situations are all too common, usually involving “big” Italian, French and
The wine in the title caption above has certainly moved into my top five most insane quality-for-price experiences of all time. Let’s think about this—a spectacular old vines Pinot Noir from Côte d’Or that passes itself off under an unassuming, general Burgundy appellation label, produced according to green viticultural practices that are certified by the most stringent and fanatical board of its kind in France. Producers who upon constant inspection and reporting, maintain their highly coveted “Terra Vitis” association certification do not tend to produce wines on the cheap. Nevertheless, here we have an unpretentious $14.99 bottle of Pinot Noir that deserves much more in the way of pomp than an unfortunate number of more costly, highly touted prestige appellation reds from
Tasting notes:
The nose is lovely, with concentrated strawberry jam, light earth, a hint of black truffle and spice. An intense set of refreshing strawberry and cherry flavors is rendered to near perfection under a light texture with minimal tannins. Not lacking a light yet compelling spicy character, the perfectly balanced sweetness-acidity factor of the fruit is also rounded out with warm robust tones of truffle and earth. I’m thinking of seared tuna steak au poivre but with a wine like this, there are many more exciting possibilities for the foodies to come up with than what I can muster.

4 comments:
Recently - March? February? - I had the same Le Hardi and I thought it disappointing. Absolutley none of your "beautifully intercalated layers of warm spice, smoky wood, black truffle and rich fruit" appeared for me, only "wave after wave of" slightly sour cherry water. It did indeed have an "imperceptible, powerful mast of almost tannin-less structure." I would be willing to give it another try, in case I had a bad bottle.
For delightful, evolving, complex aroma and wave after wave of incredible Pinot experience, I much prefer a bottle of 2004 M. Sarrazin Givry Champs Lalot Veille Vignes, $23.49
Maybe a bad bottle? Wine is so subjective, I don't want to doubt you though. I had three before writing the review. Sounds like a disappointing experience but in terms of your recommendation...I will indeed try! Thanks very much!
When I purchased the above referenced bottle, I also got a 2003 Château Philippe-Le-Hardi Mercurey 1er Cru "Les Puillets" (Terra Vitis Cert.) I served it at our house during a red&white Burgundy tasting/dinner. I had a nip and thought it quite nice, but during the chaos of the transition from patio tasting to indoor dinner I did not get to revisit it before it was empty. I guess the others deemed it "worthy" in a field of other fabulous Beaunes, Bourgognes, Givrys, a Pommard and a Savignu-les-Beaune. A few experienced pallettes (who often buy, store and drink $$$ wine) were impressed and wanted to know where I got it and if it was expensive. Total Wine, Cherry Hill. It was above the Enotheqe $ limit, but I belive it was only in the mid-20s.
Also try the white generic Phillipe Le Hardi Bourgogne Blanc. I just purchased a bottle around $16-17 from Total Wine, Cherry Hill, and was impressed with the style and structure, which made me want to go and seek out this producers "Top" wines.
Post a Comment